Zhaomeng Lin hit a few years dozens of claims of copyright on the Peking Opera, awarded over a hundred million. Against the accused in all, mostly because the defendant used the Opera mask and Mr. Zhao's
the same case, just a few years dozens, awarded over a hundred million! And prosecution of such incidents did not stop, continue, Mr. Zhao has become specialized households litigation in this area, why? People's awareness of the law is now weak that? Or Opera Mask mode and our own legal workers (no professional knowledge of opera) to the Zhao such a This can not but cause people to think deeply. Prosecutions so frequent, in favor of copyright protection in the case, should be unprecedented. In favor of such an event seems very reasonable, it reminds me not help, Wang counterfeiting, car Pengci other events.
Zhao wins copyright claim repeatedly, let us ponder, together find the right answers to such things happen less, preferably not happen!
One reason: the Chinese Beijing Opera is a cultural treasure, is part of the Chinese people, the world's people. Peking Opera is also belong to people around the world, not just belonging to a certain individual. Can not say that Mei Lanfang Mei school singing is a person belonging to Mr. Mei, the other person can not sing, is the infringement of it.
Furthermore, said Mr. Zhao Menglin has said he is the author of Add hair and Rankou, which he and other artists, or Peking Opera Peking Opera facial makeup experts drawn the most significant difference is his original, should enjoy the copyright. But I check, Master Merlin China's Peking Opera facial makeup in the opera Mr. Fang is a positive picture on the big, without Rankou. There is also money Jinfu, Fu Oda, Wang Hongshou, SUN Shi, Ji-Guang, Wu literature, Liu Wei, ZHANG Hong-da, Zhang, Fu Xuebin, Tianyou Liang, and many artists have painted the old and the paint is still such a positive , without hair, not wearing the mask Rankou. Modern new generation of artists, painters and other paintings that facial makeup even more, because each study painting mask, whether artists, scholars and students are learning from the start of a positive mask. Mr. Zhao Menglin published in the So original, I think that is amusement Some lawyers do not understand the art of Peking Opera only. All in favor of Mr. Zhao's case, there is which one is an expert with Peking Opera play?
two reasons: It is the Internet era, network information over the place, I believe we are looking for information from the Internet experience. In any network search engine search for infringement. In other words, regardless of who actually created the Internet, Facebook, can be said that Mr. Zhao, then this reasoning, all of the positive mask is the copyright of Mr. Zhao (Conversely, if tens of thousands of online face mask, are Mr. Zhao painting is even more intriguing is). So, Peking Opera mask to the front of a person merely Zhao. Thus, Peking Opera is widely heritage of this outcome has become its own cultural products, Peking Opera can not understand, fans can not understand, millions of Chinese people can not understand! But Mr. Zhao won again and again, and won the case based on the success awarded again, this can not help but feel sad, If this trend continues, Zhaomeng Lin will be the Beijing Opera facial painting of Shizu positive, consistent with the fact that it? I think this is the heritage of Chinese art history's great events!
three reasons: Mr. Zhao's Well, other people learn in the Peking Opera facial makeup artists or enthusiasts, artists, or through the computer software to create the basis in the senior mask made out loss figure, but also strike a copyright! It should be said, this facial chart also has originality.
mentioned above is not the one for Zhao, but hoped that the country can be faster and better development of the corresponding laws, regulations, following to protect the rights of individuals, but also allows the Chinese culture and art The wider the heritage treasures!
All rights reserved Please genus Arts meters dawn
No comments:
Post a Comment